Concatenating files

suggest change

It is well known that you cannot use the same file for input and ouput in the same command. For instance,

$ cat header.txt body.txt >body.txt

doesn’t do what you want. By the time cat reads body.txt, it has already been truncated by the redirection and it is empty. The final result will be that body.txt will hold the contents of header.txt only.

One might think to avoid this with process substitution, that is, that the command

$ cat header.txt <(cat body.txt) > body.txt

will force the original contents of body.txt to be somehow saved in some buffer somewhere before the file is truncated by the redirection. It doesn’t work. The cat in parentheses begins reading the file only after all file descriptors have been set up, just like the outer one. There is no point in trying to use process substitution in this case.

The only way to prepend a file to another file is to create an intermediate one:

$ cat header.txt body.txt >
$ mv body.txt

which is what sed or perl or similar programs do under the carpet when called with an edit-in-place option (usually -i).

Feedback about page:

Optional: your email if you want me to get back to you:

Table Of Contents