# Operator precedence

suggest changeOperators are listed top to bottom, in descending precedence. Operators with the same number have equal precedence and the same associativity.

`::`

- The postfix operators:
`[]`

`()`

`T(...)`

`.`

`->`

`++`

`--`

`dynamic_cast`

`static_cast`

`reinterpret_cast`

`const_cast`

`typeid`

- The unary prefix operators:
`++`

`--`

`\*`

`&`

`\+`

`\-`

`\!`

`~`

`sizeof`

`new`

`delete`

`delete[]`

; the C-style cast notation,`(T)...`

; (C++11 and above)`sizeof...`

`alignof`

`noexcept`

`.*`

and`->*`

`\*`

,`/`

, and`%`

, binary arithmetic operators`\+`

and`\-`

, binary arithmetic operators`<<`

and`>>`

`\<`

,`\>`

,`<=`

,`>=`

`==`

and`!=`

`&`

, the bitwise AND operator`^`

`|`

`&&`

`||`

`?:`

(ternary conditional operator)`=`

,`*=`

,`/=`

,`%=`

,`+=`

,`-=`

,`>>=`

,`<<=`

,`&=`

,`^=`

,`|=`

`throw`

`,`

(the comma operator)

The assignment, compound assignment, and ternary conditional operators are right-associative. All other binary operators are left-associative.

The rules for the ternary conditional operator are a bit more complicated than simple precedence rules can express.

- An operand binds less tightly to a
`?`

on its left or a`:`

on its right than to any other operator. Effectively, the second operand of the conditional operator is parsed as though it is parenthesized. This allows an expression such as`a ? b , c : d`

to be syntactically valid. - An operand binds more tightly to a
`?`

on its right than to an assignment operator or`throw`

on its left, so`a = b ? c : d`

is equivalent to`a = (b ? c : d)`

and`throw a ? b : c`

is equivalent to`throw (a ? b : c)`

. - An operand binds more tightly to an assignment operator on its right than to
`:`

on its left, so`a ? b : c = d`

is equivalent to`a ? b : (c = d)`

.

Found a mistake? Have a question or improvement idea?
Let me know.

Table Of Contents