Template parameter deduction for constructors
suggest changePrior to C++17, template deduction cannot deduce the class type for you in a constructor. It must be explicitly specified. Sometimes, however, these types can be very cumbersome or (in the case of lambdas) impossible to name, so we got a proliferation of type factories (like make_pair()
, make_tuple()
, back_inserter()
, etc.).
This is no longer necessary:
std::pair p(2, 4.5); // std::pair<int, double>
std::tuple t(4, 3, 2.5); // std::tuple<int, int, double>
std::copy_n(vi1.begin(), 3,
std::back_insert_iterator(vi2)); // constructs a back_insert_iterator<std::vector<int>>
std::lock_guard lk(mtx); // std::lock_guard<decltype(mtx)>
Constructors are considered to deduce the class template parameters, but in some cases this is insufficient and we can provide explicit deduction guides:
template <class Iter>
vector(Iter, Iter) -> vector<typename iterator_traits<Iter>::value_type>
int array[] = {1, 2, 3};
std::vector v(std::begin(array), std::end(array)); // deduces std::vector<int>
Found a mistake? Have a question or improvement idea?
Let me know.
Table Of Contents