Go suggest change


Go uses goroutines for concurrency. Simplifying, they are like threads.

Gorutines execute independently and share memory space.

Since they can write to the same memory, care needs to be taken when writing to the same global variables from multiple goroutines.

To coordinate work between goroutines Go provides channels, which are thread-safe queues.

Here’s an example of using worker pool of goroutines and coordinating their work with channels:

var wg sync.WaitGroup

func sqrtWorker(chIn chan int, chOut chan int) {
	fmt.Printf("sqrtWorker started\n")
	for i := range chIn {
		sqrt := i * i
		chOut <- sqrt
	fmt.Printf("sqrtWorker finished\n")

func main() {
	chIn := make(chan int)
	chOut := make(chan int)
	for i := 0; i < 2; i++ {
		go sqrtWorker(chIn, chOut)

	go func() {
		chIn <- 2
		chIn <- 4

	go func() {

	for sqrt := range chOut {
		fmt.Printf("Got sqrt: %d\n", sqrt)
sqrtWorker started
Got sqrt: 4
sqrtWorker started
sqrtWorker finished
sqrtWorker finished
Got sqrt: 16

There’s a lot to unpack here.

We launch 2 workers with go sqrtWorker(chIn, chOut).

Each sqrtWorker function is running independently and concurrently with all other code.

We use a single channel of int values to queue work items to be processed by worker goroutines using <- send operation on a channel.

Most of the time it’s not safe to access the same variable from multiple goroutines. Channels and sync.WaitGroup are exceptions.

Worker goroutines sqrtWorker pick up values from the channel using range.

We don’t know which worker will pick any given value.

Worker’s for loop terminates when chIn is closed with close(chIn) and worker goroutine terminates.

To pass results of worker goroutines back to the caller we use another channel.

In this example we use unbuffered channels which only have capacity for one item at a time. For that reason we launch another goroutine to fill chIn. Otherwise we would risk dead-lock.

To shutdown workers we close the chIn.

We then wait for results created by workers by iterating on chOut.

There’s one more complication. Unless we close chOut, the for sqrt := range chOut loop will wait forever.

To stop the loop, we need to close(chOut) but when to do it?

We can’t do it in sqrtWorker because there are many of them and calling close on an already closed channel will panic.

sync.WaitGroup is a thread-safe counter that can be incremented / decremented and allows for waiting until the counter reaches 0.

Before we launch the worker, we increment wg counter.

Just before terminating, the worker decrements wg counter.

We then wg.Wait() for the counter to reach 0, which indicates that all workers have finished and it’s now safe to close the output channel.

It has to happen in its own goroutine to avoid blocking.

Why go to all this trouble to calculate a simple value?

This is just an example. In a real programs worker goroutine would perform longer jobs like downloading a file from the internet or resizing a large image.

Feedback about page:

Optional: your email if you want me to get back to you:

Table Of Contents